IS THERE REALLY ANY DIFFERENCE?

A Socialist is a Socialist. When looking at the platforms of each of these two left leaners, how much difference do we find?

Second Amendment - Obama:

Ban semi-automatics, and more possession restrictions

Principles that Obama supports on gun issues:
• Ban the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons.
• Increase state restrictions on the purchase and possession of firearms.
• Require manufacturers to provide child-safety locks with firearms.

Second Amendment - Hillary:

License and register all handgun sales, Tough gun control keeps guns out of wrong hands,Lock up guns; store ammo separately. -

Hillary keeps herself vague on his issue. Obama is more directly anti-Constitutional when it comes to guns.


Border Fence - Obama:

They are both basically the same. Obama voted NO in 2006 and YES in 2007. Hillary has had a less waffling opinion, although one has to really "suspend disbelief" to think she would want to have any sort of border fence, voting NO on the fence and being a one worlder and a Neo-Con.

Democrats on U.S. sovereignty:

Raleigh, NC. Immediately upon assuming the leadership in Congress, the Democrats went to work frantically attempting to make U.S. Foreign Policy subservient to the most corrupt organization in the world, the United Nations. Clearly violating the terms of the U.S. Constitution, which clearly state that the notion of national sovereignty automatically renders null and void any attempt to subvert the nation's policies to an outside 'policing agency,' the Democrats obviously place more trust in the thugs of the U.N., such as Cuba, Syria, Iran, North Korea, and France, than they do the American people and their elected officials. For them to succeed in this scheme would be one more sad and dangerous chapter to add to the already bulging record the Democrats have amassed which fully portrays to the public Jefferson's notion of 'elective despotism.'

Yes, they were elected. The people who elected them gave them power to enact legislation that is clearly antithetical to every Constitutional principle that has guided this nation for most of its history. Thus, according to Jefferson, they would be considered despots, tyrants whose actions are entirely illegitimate.

Republicans want their presidential candidate to promise that he will never try to bamboozle them with a similar so-called "comprehensive" immigration bill or a so-called "DREAM Act," which includes amnesty for the millions of illegal immigrants now in the United States.

Republicans want their candidate to tell us now exactly what he will do to prevent the entry of illegal drugs over the U.S.-Mexico border. They want a presidential candidate to say he will pardon border guards Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean who are unjustly imprisoned for intercepting a professional Mexican drug smuggler.

Republicans want their candidate to build the fence on the U.S.-Mexico border legislated by the Secure Fence Law. Republicans want their candidate to promise to enforce the law against employers hiring illegal immigrants.

Republicans want their candidate to explain how he will lift the tax burden that Americans suffer today in providing a net value of $20,000 a year to every illegal immigrant household.

Republicans want their candidate to stop the entry of Mexican trucks onto U.S. highways and roads. They want their candidate to deep-six the plan called "totalization," which would put illegal immigrants into the U.S. Social Security system.

Republicans want their presidential candidate to protect parents' rights in public schools by repudiating the offensive and impudent 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' decision ruling that parents' fundamental right to control the upbringing of their children "does not extend beyond the threshold of the school door."

Since the federal government gives about $60 billion a year to public schools, Republicans want their candidate to promise to sign school appropriation bills only if they contain language to protect parents' rights to protect their children against such things as mental health screening; forcing schoolchildren to be put on psychotropic drugs; courses that promote Islam or homosexuality; nosy questionnaires about sex, drugs and suicide; and giving birth control to sixth-grade girls without parents' knowledge or consent.

Smart Republicans want their presidential candidate to reach out to Reagan Democrats by rejecting trade deals that are unfair to American workers and allow foreign countries to discriminate against U.S. producers and products by subsidies and tax rebates. Republicans want to hear a presidential candidate's plan to get the United States out from under the hostility of the World Trade Organization, which has ruled against the United States in 40 out of 47 cases.

Americans want to hear whether or not their presidential candidate supports the "global economy," which forces Americans to compete against pitifully low wages, slave labor, and discriminatory practices imposed by foreign countries and foreign tribunals. Americans don't want to be patronized by being told that we must be more competitive with Chinese factory workers who are paid 30 cents an hour with no benefits.

Grass-roots Americans want their candidate for president to promise that the Security and Prosperity Partnership will not be a steppingstone to a North American Union modeled on the European Union. Republicans expect their candidate to announce that he will never allow the United States to be economically integrated with Mexico and Canada, and will never allow the free movement of labor across open borders.

Most Americans want national leadership so that our economy produces good jobs that enable men to buy a home and a car, support their families, live the American dream and confidently expect their children to have an even better life. We're listening to the candidates and waiting to hear them address these important issues.

HEY !!! ARE YOU LISTENING TO US ???